|
|
“L'immobilier géolocalisé efficace” |
Houla ça tape dur de l'autre côté de l'Atlantique
Par phev 
, le 9 janvier 2007
"The crisis is entirely the work of Fed Chairman, Alan Greenspan, whose “cheap money” policy caused a speculative frenzy in the real estate market which sent home prices through the stratosphere."
le marché est sain et non spéculatif
"He kept the printing presses whirring along at full-tilt while the banks and mortgage lenders devised every scam imaginable to put greenbacks into the hands unqualified borrowers"
Le marché est sain et non spéculatif
"Greenspan executed the swindle with the adroitness of a carnival huckster; luring millions of buyers to the real estate gold rush"
Le marché est sain et non spéculatif
"Greenspan knew that his “low interest rate bonanza” was driving the wooden stake into America’s heart. In fact, every banker understands the effects of interest rates; it’s fundamental to their trade. Lower the interest rates and the people will swarm to the banks like piranhas to a hambone. It never fails."
Houla Les taux bas... Vraiment les gens sont comme cela en période de taux bas ? Des piranhas sur un jambon...
Bonanza c'est une loterie non ? A tout les coups on gagne...
"The housing bubble has nothing to do with “market forces” or (Gawd help us) supply-and-demand. That’s all gibberish. Low interest rates provide a channel for pumping cheap money into the economy which inevitably creates equity bubbles."
Meuh non René a dit que le marché est sain et Gabriël qu'il est non spéculatif.
"Greenspan lowered rates to 1%, he knew that he was simply trading a technology bubble for a real estate bubble. Now, of course, he has retired before the wheels fall off the cartso he can avoid being blamed for the coming catastrophe."
Houla des déclinologues...
“The secondary effects of the “1 out of 5” sub-prime default rate will be a chain reaction of rising interest rates and falling home prices engendering still more defaults, with the added foreclosures causing the cycle to repeat. In my opinion, when the cycle is fully played out we are more likely to see an 80% default rate rather than 20%”.
Ha Ha Ha 80% de taux de défaut, si c'est vrai cela va faire très mal... Ca va piquer le cul comme dirait Kurt...
"Why would anyone stretch to spend 40% of his monthly income to service a $700,000 mortgage on a condo valued at $500,000, especially when there are plenty of comparable rentals that are far more affordable?"
Ouais cela semble clair, everybody ferait comme cela...
For the majority of homeowners, they are now ‘lobster potted’ for the rest of their lives in the 21st Century’s version of the Victorian treadmill. Welcome to modern debt-controlled serfdom, where if you lose your job, either through retrenchment or illness, you lose your home.
Meuh non l'immobilier c'est la SECURITE, il est con lui ou quoi... Même Gillou le sait !
Bon je vous laisse lire la suite...
0 clics |
Article : http://www.atlanticfreepress.com/content/view/614/81/ |